gwalla (gwalla) wrote,
gwalla
gwalla

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Yet more musical math

Yes, I'm still going on about this.

A few days ago I realized that if I allowed durations to be negative, then retrograde (horizontal inversion) would be a special case of multiplication—motive multiplied by a note of negative duration—and therefore multiplication would be able to describe canon in contrary motion, without having to alter the definition of multiplication. Pretty sweet. But I was sort of frustrated that I couldn't define vertical inversion similarly.

Then just the other day I hit on it. It's based on another operation I'd played around with when I was first coming up with the idea of motivic math: multiplication of the intervals in a motive by an interval. The solution is to give notes an extra quality, called span (I'd call it height but I think most would assume that to be synonymous with tone). The product of two notes A and B would be defined as a note C where:

Ctiming = Atiming+BtimingAduration
Cduration = AdurationBduration
Ctone = Atone+BtoneAspan
Cspan = AspanBspan

Vertical inversion would therefore be multiplication of a motive by a note with a duration of negative one.
Tags: ideas, music
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments