gwalla (gwalla) wrote,
gwalla
gwalla

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Everybody's favorite subject: punctuation reform!

We need to bring back the rhetorical question mark. Seriously. From the Wikipedia article on the question mark:
The rhetorical question mark first appeared in the 1580s and was used at the end of a rhetorical question, however it died out of use in the 1600s. It was the reverse of an ordinary question mark, so that instead of the main opening pointing back into the sentence, it opened away from it.

With the increasing use of written text for casual conversation, we've been running up against the edge of what the current set of punctuation marks can express. We've all heard the complaints that "sarcasm doesn't work in text", or that "text can't express tone of voice". Smilies have been developed as a way of simulating facial expressions, a crucial bit of context for casual speech, but I think that expanding the repertoire of punctuation would also help.

I also like the interrobang, although it doesn't really fill a gap the way the rhetorical question mark does. The combination "?!" works just fine, although a case could be made that it looks cartoony and immature, and the interrobang looks more dignified.
Subscribe

  • URRRGH

    So today I got lost in San Francisco on the way to the test, hit another car (not very hard and there was no visible damage, but we exchanged our…

  • Well, Japanese final's over

    I think I did OK. I hope I did better than last time. The essay portion actually came pretty easily, and it wasn't just regurgitating my previous HW…

  • Movie night at Davies for Halloween: Jekyll & Hyde / The Haunted House

    So last night I saw a couple of movies at the Symphony: the silent "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" with John Barrymore and Buster Keaton's short "The…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments