?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
10 May 2006 @ 12:15 am
Comics and attracting female readers  
Some musing inspired by the discussion following this post by heykidzcomix.

The question of how to attract female readers to comic books is the source of much debate and hand-wringing in the industry. The major publishers both, on occasion, decide that they're going to make an effort to get girls into comics. They know that girls like manga, so they try incorporating anime/manga styles and tropes (e.g. Marvel Mangaverse, which is generally terrible, and Mary Jane, formerly Mary Jane Loves Spider-Man, which is charming and fun). They push titles with female heroes beating up baddies. They succeed marginally if at all.

I think the problem is not necessarily one of methodology (although those attempts at anime-fying superheroes can be pretty hamfisted), but of scope. When a publisher decides to attempt to woo female audiences, it's usually its own little thing, set apart from the rest, like one or two titles devoted to the purpose. Meanwhile, the rest of the editors, writers, and artists continue to operate under the (safe) assumption that their audience is primarily young men, and produce accordingly. They know their audience; it just isn't the audience they want to add. So the peace offerings to the female contingent drown in a sea of testosterone, and as a result female readers don't get a significantly better impression of American comic books as a whole.

People tend to repeat the assertion that the problem is that many male writers attempting to write "strong female characters" end up writing macho men with breasts. To some extent this is true, but they also point to the "bad girl" comics as examples. This is a red herring, I think. While "bad girl" creators were fond of claiming that they were promoting "images of strong females", this was never more than an excuse. The central premise behind the bad girls, which I'm certain all of those writers understood, was to have a adolescent wank-fantasies for protagonists, while giving them "macho badass" personalities their adolescent male readers could grok (many boys would have a hard time letting themselves identify with a character who worries about her appearance or is otherwise "girly", but punching people in the face is much more in their comfort zone).
 
 
Current Mood: thoughtfulthoughtful
Current Music: Man...or Astroman? - You Can't Get Good Riblets in Space
 
 
 
Amber "glych" Greenleeglych on May 10th, 2006 07:54 pm (UTC)
Red Dahlia is about a size 10. I based her body type after Marilyn Monroe who during her career was anywhere between a size 8 and a size 16, depending on the year (Just watch The Misfits sometime where she was at her heaviest).

Despite her weight changes, Marilyn was and will always be beautiful because she had an inner glow that shined through.

Like a good story in comics, it's what's INSIDE that counts.

I once drew a commission of Lady Death for someone at Comic Con; I spent a long time on it, shading it with Copic Markers in different tones of grey. One thing that Adam Hughes understands, is that -if you draw a woman with huge breasts, you draw the body to support them.. That means a slightly wider shoulder width, a little bit more meat around the stomach area than you'd expect, and a little bit more girth in the booty. It evens out the form, making it seem more sensual and soft rather than looking like a twig with bubbles. I've nothing against Michael Turner, I'm just not fond of his liberal use of anatomy.

-glych
Amber "glych" Greenleeglych on May 10th, 2006 07:58 pm (UTC)
I accidently hit "post" before I finished my point.

Anyhoo, this commission I had finished gave Lady Death a realistic body type. When the guy got it, he paid be an extra $50 (on top of the original $30 commission) because it was "the best one he'd ever gotten because she looked like a "real beautiful woman."

It was one of the nicest things anyone ever said about my work...And the $50 went towards several decent meals after the main floor closed for the rest of convention. ^_^

-glych
Derakonderakon on May 11th, 2006 02:08 am (UTC)
May I just say...

Holy shit, your work has gotten better! I last saw your artwork when you were doing...um, the autobiographical comic whose name I now forget. *cough* Very nice work on the Red Dahlia stuff.
Amber "glych" Greenleeglych on May 11th, 2006 01:16 pm (UTC)
*blush*

Thank you.

The semi-autobiographical comic was called "Glych's Experiment."

Check out the rest of the site (Especially the Other Vomics Section) to see some other stuff. I'm still doing to Experiment as well as No Stereotypes (A new version I've been working on since 2003 that was on Modern Tales for a time) and NonPersons (which used to be on Graphic Smash for a time) is there too, though not being updated.

-glych